2026-03-08T13:58:03Z https://it-hiroshima.repo.nii.ac.jp/oai

oai:it-hiroshima.repo.nii.ac.jp:00000583 2023-07-25T10:45:34Z 1:17:211

Notes on Chaucer’s went(e 酒見, 紀成 サケミ, キセイ Sakemi, Kisei 933 Tense shift Manuscript Scribe application/pdf As many scholars have pointed out，it is very difficult to say which of the different forms are due to Chaucer，and which have been introduced by one of other of his scribes. In this paper，contrary to Stephen Barney's footnote on p. 500 in The Riverside Chaucer which，it seems，was revised soon after the first impression was published in 1987，I wish to show that the tense of the went(e in Troilus and Criseyde，II，812，is the preterite，and not the present. 広島工業大学 1997-02 eng departmental bulletin paper VoR https://it-hiroshima.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/583 http://ci.nii.ac.jp/naid/40003284352/ http://ci.nii.ac.jp/naid/40003284352/ AN0021271X 03851672 広島工業大学研究紀要 31 7 14 https://it-hiroshima.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/583/files/kenkyukiyo31007.pdf application/pdf 292.5 kB 2023-03-30